Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:52
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How John Cena recreated CM Punk’s Pipe Bomb promo and changed his farewell tour - Cageside Seats
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
How can one learn to talk frankly?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Who would win in this boxing matchup between these two, Dillian Whyte or Samuel Peter?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Where in Maine are you most likely to get a dangerous tick bite? - The Portland Press Herald
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Can Japan hold on to its ‘indispensable’ companies? - Financial Times
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
AI risks 'broken' career ladder for college graduates, some experts say - ABC News
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What is the recommended frequency for using a red light therapy device for skin?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?